The evidence is better than the headline. It changes what the next decision should be.
Maya Chen
I annotate the parts worth returning to.
This is the part I keep thinking about. It changes what the next decision should be.
Good curation is not reducing a work to a summary. It is pointing at the small passage that unlocks the shape of the whole argument.
Context makes the take sharper, not softer. It changes what the next decision should be.
A source link is not a footnote. It is the bridge between a strong opinion and the evidence that lets somebody else decide whether it holds up.
A useful framing for how we build now. It changes what the next decision should be.
The evidence is better than the headline. It changes what the next decision should be.
A source link is not a footnote. It is the bridge between a strong opinion and the evidence that lets somebody else decide whether it holds up.
This is the part I keep thinking about. It changes what the next decision should be.
Context makes the take sharper, not softer. It changes what the next decision should be.
A source link is not a footnote. It is the bridge between a strong opinion and the evidence that lets somebody else decide whether it holds up.
A useful framing for how we build now. It changes what the next decision should be.
Good curation is not reducing a work to a summary. It is pointing at the small passage that unlocks the shape of the whole argument.
The evidence is better than the headline. It changes what the next decision should be.
This is the part I keep thinking about. It changes what the next decision should be.
Good curation is not reducing a work to a summary. It is pointing at the small passage that unlocks the shape of the whole argument.